Sundown Towns–1

http://www.prrac.org/full_text.php?text_id=1055&item_id=9653&newsletter_id=84&header=Civil+Rights+History

“Sundown Towns”

by James W. Loewen November/December 2005 issue of Poverty & Race

Between 1890 and 1968, thousands of towns across the United States drove out their black populations or took steps to forbid African Americans from living in them. Thus were created “sundown towns,” so named because many marked their city limits with signs typically reading, “Nigger, Don’t Let The Sun Go Down On You In ___.” Some towns in the West drove out or kept out Chinese Americans. A few excluded Native Americans or Mexican Americans. “Sundown suburbs” developed a little later, mostly between 1900 and 1968. Many suburbs kept out not only African Americans but also Jews.

I learned of these towns gradually, over many years. Back in the 1960s, when going to college in Minnesota, I heard residents of Edina, the most prestigious suburb of Minneapolis, boast that their community had, as they put it, “Not one Negro and not one Jew.” The Academy Award-winning movie of 1947, Gentleman’s Agreement, taught me about the method by which Darien, Connecticut, one of the most prestigious suburbs of New York City, kept out Jews. Later I learned of the acronym that residents of Anna, Illinois, applied to their town: “Ain’t No Niggers Allowed.”

Each of these stories seemed outrageous. I resolved to write a book about the phenomenon. Initially, I imagined I would find maybe ten of these communities in Illinois (my home state, where I planned to do more research than in any other single state), and perhaps 50 across the country.

To my astonishment, I found 472 sundown towns in Illinois, a clear majority of all of the 621 incorporated places of more than 1,000 population. (I made no systematic study of towns smaller than that.) Similar proportions obtained in Indiana, Missouri, Oregon and probably many other states. I found hundreds more across the United States and now estimate that probably 10,000 such towns exist. By 1970, more than half of all incorporated communities outside the traditional South probably excluded African Americans. (Whites in the traditional South were appalled by the practice—why would you make your maid leave?) Sundown towns ranged from hamlets like De Land, Illinois, population 500, to large cities like Appleton, Wisconsin, with 57,000 residents in 1970. Sometimes entire counties went sundown, usually when their county seats did. Independent sundown towns were soon joined by “sundown suburbs,” often even larger, such as Glendale, a suburb of Los Angeles, with more than 60,000; Levittown, on Long Island, more than 80,000; and Warren, a Detroit suburb with 180,000 residents.

The History

These towns and these practices do not date back to the Civil War. On the contrary, between about 1863 and 1890, African Americans went everywhere in America. During this “springtime of freedom,” many communities, especially those with large Quaker, Unitarian or Republican populations, welcomed them. Then, between 1890 and 1940, blacks commenced a “Great Retreat.” This period is becoming known as the “nadir of race relations,” when lynchings peaked, white owners expelled black baseball players from the major (and minor) leagues, and flourishing unions drove African Americans from such occupations as railroad fireman and meat processor.

During this era, whites in many communities indulged in little race riots that until now have been lost to history. Whites in Liberty, Oregon, for example, now part of Salem, ordered their blacks to leave in 1893. Pana, Illinois, drove out its African Americans in 1899, killing five in the process. Anna, Illinois, followed suit in 1909, Pinckneyville probably in 1928. Harrison, Arkansas, took two riots by whites before the job was done—in 1905 and 1909. Decatur, Indiana, expelled its black population in 1902. White workers in Austin, Minnesota, repeatedly drove out African Americans in the 1920s and 1930s. Other towns that drove out their black populations violently include Myakka City, Florida; Spruce Pine, North Carolina; Wehrum, Pennsylvania; Ravenna, Kentucky; Greensburg, Indiana; St. Genevieve, Missouri; North Platte, Nebraska; Oregon City, Oregon; and many others. Some of these mini-riots in turn spurred whites in nearby smaller towns to have their own, thus provoking little waves of expulsions. White residents of Vienna, Illinois, set fire to the homes in its black neighborhood as late as 1954!

Many towns that had no African-American residents maintain strong oral traditions of having passed ordinances forbidding blacks from remaining after dark. In California, for example, the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s tried to locate a company of African-American workers in a large park that bordered Burbank and Glendale. Both cities refused, each citing an old ordinance that prohibited African Americans within their city limits after sundown. Other towns passed ordinances in Arizona, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Tennessee, Ohio, Maryland and probably many other states. Some towns believed their ordinances remained in effect long after the 1954 Brown decision and 1964 Civil Rights Act. The city council of New Market, Iowa, for example, suspended its sundown ordinance for one night in the mid-1980s to allow an interracial band to play at a town festival, but it went back into effect the next day. Other towns kept out African Americans by less formal measures, such as cutting off city water, having police call hourly all night with reports of threats, or assaulting African-American children as they tried to go to school.

Some sundown towns allowed one exception. When whites drove African Americans from Hamilton County, Texas, for example, they allowed the elderly “Uncle Alec” and “Aunt Mourn” Gentry to remain. In about 1950, whites in Marshall, Illinois, even christened their exception, “Squab” Wilson, the barber, an “honorary white man.” Meanwhile, Marshall posted the traditional sundown signs. Other permitted exceptions included live-in servants in white households and inmates of mental and penal institutions.

Maintaining Sundown-ness

How have these towns maintained themselves all-white? By a variety of means, public and private. DWB, for example—“driving while black”—is no new phenomenon in sundown towns; as far back as the 1920s, police officers routinely followed and stopped black motorists or questioned them when they stopped. Suburbs used zoning and eminent domain to keep out black would-be residents and to take their property if they did manage to acquire it. Some towns required all residential areas to be covered by restrictive covenants—clauses in deeds that stated, typically:

No lot shall ever be sold, conveyed, leased, or rented to any person other than one of the white or Caucasian race, nor shall any lot ever be used or occupied by any person other than one of the white or Caucasian race, except such as may be serving as domestics for the owner or tenant of said lot, while said owner or tenant is residing thereon. [from Edina]

Always, lurking under the surface, was the threat of violence or such milder white misbehavior as refusing to sell groceries or gasoline to black newcomers.

The Civil Rights Movement left these towns largely untouched. Indeed, some locales in the Border States forced out their black populations in response to Brown v. Board of Education. Sheridan, Arkansas, for example, compelled its African Americans to move to neighboring Malvern in 1954 after the school board’s initial decision to comply with Brown prompted a firestorm of protest. Having no black populations, these towns and counties then had no African Americans to test their public accommodations. For 15 years after the 1964 Civil Rights Act, motels and restaurants in some sundown towns continued to exclude African Americans, thus forcing black travelers to avoid them or endure humiliating and even dangerous conditions. Today, public accommodations in sundown towns are generally open. Many towns—probably more than half—have given up their exclusionary residential policies, while others still make it uncomfortable or impossible for African Americans to live in them.

Adverse Impacts

These towns also have an adverse impact on their own residents. When kids ask parents why they live in a given town, especially if it is a suburb, parents are apt to reply that it is a good environment for raising children. The children know full well that their town is overwhelmingly white, making it logical to infer that an environment without blacks is “good.” While anti-racist whites can emerge from such settings, and some have, it is far easier to conclude that African Americans are bad and to be avoided. Young people from sundown towns often feel a sense of dread when they find themselves in racially mixed situations beyond their hometowns.

Still worse is the impact of sundown suburbs on the social system. The prestige enjoyed by many elite sundown suburbs—such as Edina, Darien or Kenilworth, the richest suburb of Chicago—makes it harder for neighboring suburbs to become and stay interracial. When a white family makes even more money than average for the interracial suburb of Oak Park, Illinois, say, they may want to express their success by moving to an even more prestigious (and more expensive) suburb, like Kenilworth. Such a family may not choose Kenilworth because it has no black families (as of the 2000 Census), but because of its prestige—but the two have been intertwined for a century.

What to Do?

What is to be done about sundown towns? Governmental action does help. Until 1968, new all-white suburbs were forming much more rapidly than old sundown towns and suburbs were caving in. In that year, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act, along with the Jones v. Mayer decision, barring discrimination in the rental and sale of property, caused the federal government to change sides and oppose sundown towns. Since then, citywide residential prohibitions against Jews, Asians, Native Americans and Hispanics have mostly disappeared. Even vis-à-vis African Americans, many towns and suburbs relaxed their exclusionary policies in the 1980s and 1990s. As of 2005, however, de facto exclusion of blacks is still all too common.

At a minimum, any former sundown town should now be asked to make three statements: admit it (“We did this.”), apologize for it (“We did this, and it was wrong.”), and proclaim they now welcome residents of all races (“We did this; it was wrong; and we don’t do it anymore.”) Even George Wallace managed these statements before he died, after all!

The last chapter of my 2005 book Sundown Towns is titled “Remedies.” It suggests things that individual families can do, policies that local governments should put into effect, acts that corporations can take, and a new law that states or the federal government should pass. The last, titled “Residents Rights Act,” is modeled to a degree on the very successful 1965 Voting Rights Act. If a community has a provable sundown past (and this can be done, as my research shows), continuing overwhelmingly white demographics, and two or more complaints from recent black would-be renters or homebuyers, then the act would kick in. Among its provisions, residents would lose the ability to exempt mortgage interest payments and property tax payments from their incomes at tax time. After all, by this exemption the federal government, seconded by state governments, means to encourage homeownership in America, a fine aim. However, homeownership by whites in sundown towns is not so fine an objective and does not deserve encouragement in the tax code. The day after this act is applied to a given sundown town or suburb, its residents will be up in arms, requesting that their government and realtors recruit African Americans as residents so they can recover this important tax break.

Even if no government enacts the Residents Rights Act, individuals can do the research to “out” sundown towns. Especially elite sundown suburbs, but even isolated independent sundown towns, rely upon deniability for their policy to work. I call this the “paradox of exclusivity.” Residents of towns like Darien, for instance, want Darien to be known as an “exclusive” community. That says good things about them—that they have the money, status and social savvy to be accepted in such a locale. They do not want to be known as “excluding”—especially on racial or religious grounds—for that would say bad things about them. So long as towns like Darien, Kenilworth, Edina and La Jolla, California, can appear “accidentally” all-white, they can avoid this difficulty. At the very least, then, making plain the conscious and often horrific decisions that underlie almost every all-white town and neighborhood in America is a first step toward ending what surely remains as the last major bastion of racial segregation in America.

James W. Loewen is the author of Lies My Teacher Told Me and Lies Across America, both published by New Press, publisher of his just-released book, Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism – an important new tool for organizing around housing discrimination issues. jloewen@zoo.uvm.edu

20 comments

    • Why now? Rite after the civil war when we abolished slavery would we have to continue it in a sodden form? I don’t understand what made these people think they can do what they did to these black people. The thing that surprised me the most was how recent these things were! This kind of makes me think that this is where and when the KKK started. Also is this when we forced the blacks into the ghetto/poverty. Another thing that always bothered me was when people ask, how come the blacks living in the ghetto get out our when they ask why did they put them selves their in the first place? The answer is THEY DIDN’T. IT’S OUR FAULT. We’re not letting them get out. The reason why we’re not is because we’re not letting them to get as well educated as the people outside the ghetto. Also people are afraid to hire them.

      Bottom line is this is not right and will never be right. There was and is not an excuse you can say to justify the actions of these people.
      Even though racism will never be curied, I really hope the world will make an effort to help stop it and that we can start moving these people out of the ghetto.

      Like

    • I was extremely surprised to see how many “sundown towns” there are in america. I was surprised because this shows just how many people in America are racist. This realization is a shock because Americans are all supposed to be equal and not segregated.

      Like

    • Even after the Civil War, people were still racist. Sundown towns is just an example of that. But what shocked me was that people weren’t allowed to live somewhere just because of their religion. That is just awful and not fair. Religion should not be a reason to hate someone. Religion is just a part of what makes the person, but religion isnt everything about someone. No one should be judged based on what they believe in or what color skin they have. No one should be excluded from something because of that, and no one should feel as if they arent equal to someone else.

      Like

    • I was surprised about how many of these so called “sundown towns” are in this country and also are in Ilinois and in many other states that you wouldn’t think there would be people like that. Why would something like this even happen during this time? Why would people have this after such a horrible time in history? This could’ve let America into another problem like another Civil War. What also striked me as horrible was not just black people couldn’t be at these places, but people in the city judged you for what religion you were. You couldn’t even be Catholic or even Jewish, it was unbelievable and unimaginable.

      Like

  1. After reading the first twos sections I was appalled, sundown towns sound horrific. I can’t imagine being around during those times. Knowing that the color of my skin or my religion made me an outsider. Having to constantly be reminded by signs and sayings and posters everywhere. To have to feel less than everyone else.

    Where did the blacks live? I mean there were suburbs basically everywhere, even if they did live in a not sundown town/suburb there was still towns nearby.

    Why did it take the government so long to fix this?

    Like

  2. Sun down towns were meant to keep out basically all races except Caucasians. Which i think is horrible because the same people who freed the slaves won’t even live in the same town as them. I mean what happened to the abolitionist? Weren’t they still fighting for equality? What did they do about sun down towns? For a second I thought what was worse this or white flight, but I decided that white flight was better, though, because it didn’t kick people out of their homes the whites moved themselves. Either way why would you free the slaves to basically force them into a ghetto. Who’s so moral and kind to free the slaves only to instruct upon the limitations so strong the only difference between that and slavery is that they don’t belong to another person, but in a way they belong to the other persons laws.

    Like

  3. This blog post talks about the sundown towns. The sundown towns were parts of different states where there was no jews or african americans allowed. There was many areas where jews and african americans were not allowed, including, “Myakka City, Florida; Spruce Pine, North Carolina; Wehrum, Pennsylvania; Ravenna, Kentucky; Greensburg, Indiana; St. Genevieve, Missouri; North Platte, Nebraska; Oregon City, Oregon; and many others. ” They tried to abolish the black population, by making riots, causing fires, and a lot more. I think that what they were doing was so terrible. They destroyed and ruined so many african americans lifes because of their skin color. The children in this time period lived there life knowing “that their town is overwhelmingly white, making it logical to infer that an environment without blacks is “good.”

    Like

  4. I think Sundown towns are discriminatory and demonstrate that African Americans are less than everyone else. I also think that Sundown towns are a bad example of who America is as a country because America is supposed to be a country where everyone is created equal.

    Like

  5. Even though I already knew what Sundown Towns were, I was shocked reading this for two reasons: the amount of sundown towns, and how long they lasted. I have relatives who were born in 1968, and in my opinion, that’s young. I liked what the author of the article wrote about remedies “We did this; it was wrong; and we don’t do it anymore.” Even though it may sound childish, acceptance is always the first step. As a person, I accept that I had a horrifyingly wrong perspective of the world when I was younger (I thought I was the center of the universe) , but I know better now, and that’s what matters.

    Like

  6. Wow. I can’t believe this was actually a thing. Why would parents actually want their children to be raised in an all white community? I think it’s important to have diversity in a community because that way you’ll be open to more than one opinion on something and learn to live with people that aren’t like you.

    Like

  7. Not allowing someone to buy or rent a home because of their race or religion is a terrible thing. Everyone is entitled to a home of their own, and preventing someone from realizing this right to a home is unethical. Not only does it make life harder for the person being discriminated against, but it also deals a mental blow of shame and anger. Housing segregation has probably happened to some past relative of all of us, for me it happened to my grandfather, which makes this issue all the more personal. To know that even some suburbs of Chicago to this day are all white because of discrimination is even more saddening. Housing discrimination is on of the main barriers that furthers racism and segregation today.
    I agree with the Loewen’s conclusion that the only way to get rid of housing discrimination is to erect local laws that would actually affect residents in the discriminating suburbs or towns. All the other measures that have been passed to attempt to combat this problem have certainly decreased the amount of sundown towns and suburbs, but there are still places that won’t change just because a Federal law was passed that won’t affect them if the residents break it. Passing a law that would take away tax breaks from residents of discriminatory neighborhoods would certainly encourage the residents who actively tried to prevent integration to change their tune. However, passing a law would also affect residents of suburbs and towns who have nothing against living side by side with African-Americans. This would be unfortunate, but it would also provide more encouragement for integrating whatever town or suburb that was affected. Passing a law like the one Loewen suggests would be the most practical way to solve the problem of housing discrimination.

    Like

  8. I think that this article has a lot of important information, but I’m really questioning how reliable this source is. Many of the things stated are facts, but some seem like opinions. For example, he says “At a minimum, any former sundown town should now be asked to make three statements: admit it (“We did this.”), apologize for it (“We did this, and it was wrong.”), and proclaim they now welcome residents of all races (“We did this; it was wrong; and we don’t do it anymore.”)”. This certainly not a fact and I don’t completely agree with this statement. Maybe at the time when these towns stopped being sundown towns, they should have said this, but that was not the opinion of everyone, so it shouldn’t be in an article like this in such an adamant way. Not everyone believed this, but it was stated like a fact. Not only did this upset me, but he also says it in a way that implies that these towns still need to say that. I don’t think that they do because most of the residents either did not live there at the time or were so young that they never had control over it. Therefore, it shouldn’t be their responsibility to apologize for something that they didn’t cause. If the author put his opinions in the article, then he should have at least explained why because now his argument seems weak and unreliable.

    Like

  9. One of the things that stood out to me here was the definition of internalization. In the text, Loewen says, “The children know full well that their town is overwhelmingly white, making it logical to infer that an environment without blacks is ‘good.'” This is called the substitution property. The town is good, the town is mostly white, so mostly white is good. So according to this article, internalization is obtaining information through logic. According to the New Oxford American Dictionary, though, it is to “make (attitudes or behavior) part of one’s nature by learning or unconscious assimilation.” I kind of agree with both of these definitions, but internalization doesn’t have to be logical or subconscious. Maybe that makes it not internalization, but honestly, I’ve thought stupid things and known that they were stupid, yet planned for the future with them. I probably would never have considered it by myself, but I kept thinking about Them. (I don’t actually remember what I wanted to do, I just remember feeling like that, so don’t ask me about it.) Internalization is really just taking something from the outside and bringing it inside.

    Like

  10. It is crazy that these “sundown towns” existed and still do exist. These people in towns were very racist and antisemitic by not letting in blacks, Jews, and other religions and races. Were the people in these sundown towns playing on the stereotype that blacks are dangerous? Why were Jews not allowed? How do these towns still exist with out police, or the government finding out?

    Like

  11. I am very shocked that people were allowed to keep black out of there towns at night. I am also surprised that there were so many towns that were sun down towns. They also had rules that blacks couldn’t go in white restaurants or buy curtain parts of land in a white neighborhood. The white were being very racist by not letting the blacks in there town after dark.

    Like

  12. It is amazingly shocking to see that these things still exist. In the case that a Negro, Jew or anyone who fits into the “other” category, could get beaten up, and even killed, just because these “others” entered a “sundown town” before sundown. This shows how much racism there was and still is.

    Like

  13. It’s so hard to believe that these existed. It is crazy and absurd. My only question is why? I think that what he said in the section named “what to do?” was very good. I liked the passage that read, “At a minimum, any former sundown town should now be asked to make three statements: admit it (“We did this.”), apologize for it (“We did this, and it was wrong.”), and proclaim they now welcome residents of all races (“We did this; it was wrong; and we don’t do it anymore”).” You can’t change the past, but you can change how it effects the future.

    Like

  14. it was very sad that they were not aloud to be their at sundown. It is a very scary thing for them to have to rush out before sundown. I am also very surprised it still happens today.

    Like

Leave a comment